Uber and ride-hailing firms on Rue de Rivoli: ban ruled illegal, Paris must back down

Published by My de Sortiraparis · Photos by My de Sortiraparis · Updated on April 27, 2026 at 10:26 a.m.
The Paris Administrative Court ruled that the ban on VTCs circulating on Rue de Rivoli and Rue Saint-Antoine since 2023 was illegal. A win for Uber, Allocab and Chabé, who argue it hampers fair competition. The city has three months to comply with the ruling issued on April 23, 2026.

This is a showdown that has stretched on for years, and justice has now brought it to a close. The Administrative Court of Paris ruled the ban on chauffeur-driven cars (VTC) using the corridor formed by rue de Rivoli and rue Saint-Antoine illegal, two central arteries in Paris's 1st and 4th arrondissements. The decision, handed down on April 23, 2026, represents a clear victory for the platforms Uber, Allocab, and Chabé, which have been pursuing this case for months.

How did Rue de Rivoli come to symbolize discord?

Since May 2020, this iconic Parisian street, running from the Bastille to the Concorde, has been reserved for bicycles and pedestrians. The measure sprang from the easing of lockdown amid the rise of the infamous "coronapistes" and was made permanent by the city hall. In an order dated July 31, 2023, the Mayor of Paris permanently narrowed car traffic along this axis to a single lane on the even-numbered side, banished to VTCs but not to taxis. The VTC drivers were thus barred from a strategic 3.5-kilometer corridor linking east and west Paris, just a stone's throw from the Louvre, the Hôtel de Ville, and Place de la Bastille.

Why did the courts side with ride-hailing services?

The city defended the measure by two aims: to promote active travel and to keep traffic flowing so that emergency services can respond quickly. But the court was not persuaded by that reasoning. Judges noted that emergency vehicles are permitted by the highway code to use bike lanes, and that banning ride-hailing cars was therefore unnecessary to guarantee their passage.

Moreover, the court found that the ban amounted to a disproportionate infringement of the freedom to conduct business and competition rules, effectively reserving the on-demand transportation service for taxis only. For the applicant companies, this is confirmation of a long-standing grievance: being barred from a major market to the sole benefit of a competing trade, without solid justification.

What concrete changes are in store for VTCs on Rue de Rivoli?

The court has ordered the Mayor of Paris to allow ride-hailing services access to the reserved lanes on the even-numbered side of Rue de Rivoli and Rue Saint-Antoine within three months. In other words, by the summer of 2026, VTC drivers should be able to use these lanes just as taxis do. A major question remains: will the City of Paris appeal this decision? The city has not commented on its plans yet.

On the plaintiffs’ side, satisfaction is total. In a statement, the involved companies hailed "the end of unfounded discrimination" that had barred them from operating normally along one of the capital’s busiest corridors. For users of these services, the ruling could also translate into shorter journeys and fewer detours imposed on their drivers.

This case highlights the enduring tension between Paris’s mobility policy, which prioritizes soft transport and reducing car space, and the requirements of competition law that also apply to urban space. The Paris Administrative Court ruled that traffic arrangements cannot ignore the rules governing professional activity. It’s a signal the City of Paris will need to factor into its future planning decisions.

Practical information

Location


75 Paris

Route planner

Comments
Refine your search
Refine your search
Refine your search
Refine your search